Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Overall Score
vs
Tamron B008S 18-270mm

Tamron B008S 18-270mm

Tamron
52 Overall Score

Scores

Macro
Canon
91
Tamron
55
Landscape
Canon
83
Tamron
58
Video Cinema
Canon
83
Tamron
44
Professional
Canon
82
Tamron
45
Travel
Canon
82
Tamron
65
Budget
Canon
80
Tamron
55
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Tamron
51
Street
Canon
68
Tamron
46
Portrait
Canon
53
Tamron
34

Specifications

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMTamron B008S 18-270mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm270 mm
Elements1516
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2222-40
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountCanon RFSony/Minolta Alpha DT
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm62 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm490 mm
Max Magnification1:4.21:3.8

Pros & Cons

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Tamron B008S 18-270mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (71st percentile)
  • Strong optical (68th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Pricing

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Tamron B008S 18-270mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider