Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm

Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm

Viltrox
45 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
59
Viltrox
76
Budget
Sigma
56
Viltrox
48
Street
Sigma
46
Viltrox
55
Macro
Sigma
16
Viltrox
49
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Viltrox
49
Professional
Sigma
42
Viltrox
47
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Viltrox
43
Travel
Sigma
40
Viltrox
24
Landscape
Sigma
33
Viltrox
30

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSViltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm
Optics
Focal Length Min16 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm135 mm
Elements14
Groups9
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/1.8
Min Aperturef/16
Constant
Diaphragm Blades11
Build
MountNikon Z
FormatFull-Frame
Weight1.27 kg
Filter Thread82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance720 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm

  • Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

No current pricing available

Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm

Verdict

Winner: Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm

Scores 45 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 16 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

BudgetTravelLandscape

Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm Better at:

MacroStreetPortraitProfessionalWildlife Sports

Also Consider