Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Hasselblad
Hasselblad
35 Overall Score
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Street
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Hasselblad | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 5★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | — | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | — | medium-format |
| Weight | — | 2.92 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | stepping motor★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 500 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.0★ |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Hasselblad
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 1 of 17 specs.