Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm

Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm

Rokinon
41 Overall Score

Scores

Portrait
Sigma
59
Rokinon
30
Budget
Sigma
56
Rokinon
39
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Rokinon
33
Street
Sigma
46
Rokinon
28
Professional
Sigma
42
Rokinon
30
Macro
Sigma
16
Rokinon
40
Travel
Sigma
40
Rokinon
24
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Rokinon
23
Landscape
Sigma
33
Rokinon
31

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSRokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm135 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm135 mm
Elements11
Groups7
Aspherical Elements0
ED Elements1
CoatingUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon EF
Formatfull-frame
Weight0.81 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance790 mm

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm

  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average build (26th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

No current pricing available

Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 19 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm Better at:

Macro

Also Consider