Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm
Viltrox
44 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Budget
Street
Macro
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 14 |
| Groups | 11 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | Full-Frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.27 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 82 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 720 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 | 1:4 |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm
- Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average build (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.060score per dollar
vs
Viltrox LAB AF 135mm f/1.8 Z 135mm0.044score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.4x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
