Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Overall Score
vs
Hasselblad XCD 25mm f/2.5 V 25mm
Hasselblad
36 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Hasselblad XCD 25mm f/2.5 V 25mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 25 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 25 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 13 |
| Groups | 11 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Hasselblad X |
| Format | full-frame★ | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.82 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor | linear stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 | 1:5.8 |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Hasselblad XCD 25mm f/2.5 V 25mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Hasselblad XCD 25mm f/2.5 V 25mm
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
