Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sirui IronStar Series 35 35mm

Sirui IronStar Series 35 35mm

Sirui
42 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sirui
43
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sirui
46
Street
Nikon
86
Sirui
38
Budget
Nikon
86
Sirui
41
Macro
Nikon
85
Sirui
48
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sirui
41
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sirui
44
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sirui
27
Travel
Nikon
75
Sirui
32

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sirui IronStar Series 35 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm60 mm
Elements1320
Groups1116
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedNeutral Flare
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.9
Constant
Diaphragm Blades916
Build
MountNikon ZARRI PL/Canon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.00 kg
Filter Thread67 mm92 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm650 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:23.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sirui IronStar Series 35 35mm

  • Strong optical (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong versatility (68th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average build (20th percentile)20th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is CA$2,359 cheaper (2.6x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score per dollar
vs
Sirui IronStar Series 35 35mm0.011score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 5.6x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sirui IronStar Series 35 35mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider