Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

Fujifilm
11 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Fujifilm
10
Portrait
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
4
Street
Nikon
86
Fujifilm
15
Budget
Nikon
86
Fujifilm
12
Macro
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
0
Landscape
Nikon
83
Fujifilm
9
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Fujifilm
10
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Fujifilm
19
Travel
Nikon
75
Fujifilm
15

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm50 mm
Elements134
Groups114
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedFujinon Super EBC coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/50
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X100
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.38 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

  • Strong build (68th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average optical (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider