Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
ATXAF107DXN

ATXAF107DXN

Kenko Tokina USA
40 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Kenko Tokina USA
35
Portrait
Nikon
89
Kenko Tokina USA
53
Street
Nikon
86
Kenko Tokina USA
47
Budget
Nikon
86
Kenko Tokina USA
42
Macro
Nikon
85
Kenko Tokina USA
18
Landscape
Nikon
83
Kenko Tokina USA
22
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Kenko Tokina USA
38
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Kenko Tokina USA
35
Travel
Nikon
75
Kenko Tokina USA
28

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8ATXAF107DXN
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.36 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

ATXAF107DXN

  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

ATXAF107DXN is CA$859 cheaper (2.3x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

ATXAF107DXN

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider