Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

Sigma
52 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
47
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
39
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
44
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
54
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
58
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
57
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
46
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
56
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
51

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements1314
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements33
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.61 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motorbuilt-in motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm950 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:2

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong optical (77th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sigma DG Macro 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider