Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 598969 600mm
Sigma
51 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Sigma Sports 598969 600mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | super-telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 300 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 600 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 28 |
| Groups | 11 | 21 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | NPC (Nano Porous Coating), Water- and Oil-Repellent Coating, Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 13★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 3.98 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | HLA-Driven High-Speed AF Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 2.80 m |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 | 1:6 |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Sigma Sports 598969 600mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score per dollar
vs
Sigma Sports 598969 600mm0.006score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 10.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
