Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Tamron
68 Overall Score
vs
XuanLens ORF 32mm
XuanLens
53 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Professional
Video Cinema
Portrait
Specifications
| Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm | XuanLens ORF 32mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 32 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 32 mm |
| Elements | 17 | — |
| Groups | 13 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Internal Surface coatings, multiple-layered coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/18 | f/10 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | f/10 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.04 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Auto Focus | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 498 mm | 32 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:3.7★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
XuanLens ORF 32mm
- Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong macro (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
No current pricing available
XuanLens ORF 32mm
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di II A14M 18-200mm
Scores 68 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 20 specs.
