KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm
KIPON
45 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Nikon Z |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.50 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
KIPON Colibri 50mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 50mm0.030score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
