Meike
Meike
71 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm
Fujifilm
80 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Video Cinema
Street
Wildlife Sports
Budget
Portrait
Landscape
Travel
Specifications
| Meike | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 23 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 23 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 15 |
| Groups | 11 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | multi coating | Super EBC coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg★ | 0.37 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:6.67★ |
Pros & Cons
Meike
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (78th percentile)
- Strong optical (76th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Meike0.223score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm0.143score per dollar
Meike offers 1.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm
Scores 80 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
