Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Canon
64 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
67
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
49
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
61
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
76
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
59
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
69
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
69
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
66
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
62
Nikon
75

Specifications

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm28 mm
Elements1913
Groups1211
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements13
CoatingSuper Spectra coatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountCanon EF-SNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.64 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops3 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance351 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.17x1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider