Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
31 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 8 | 13 |
| Groups | 6 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| Coating | Super EBC | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/35 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Nikon Z |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.19 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 280 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.17x | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.038score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
