TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm
TTArtisan
52 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
Panasonic
85 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Portrait
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Video Cinema
Specifications
| TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 20 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 60 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 11 |
| Groups | 7 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | L-Mount |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 0.35 kg |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 399 mm | 150 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.43x★ |
Pros & Cons
TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm
- Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong build (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile
Pricing
TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm0.298score per dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm0.141score per dollar
TTArtisan AF 35mm f/1.8 II 35mm offers 2.1x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R2060 20-60mm
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
