Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Canon
57 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
60
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
52
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
54
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
62
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
43
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
47
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
56
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
57
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
44
Nikon
75

Specifications

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements813
Groups611
Aspherical Elements13
ED Elements13
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades89
Build
MountCanon EFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.95 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.19x1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 is CA$411 cheaper (1.3x less).

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm0.029score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.1x better value for money

Canon L EF 50mm f/1.2L USM 50mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider