Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
Canon
64 Overall Score
Scores
Travel
Budget
Street
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Landscape
Professional
Macro
Specifications
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 9 | 10 |
| Groups | 8 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 1 | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-5.6 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 8★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon EF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.11 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| Filter Thread | 41 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 4 stops | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 914 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.215x★ | 0.19x |
Pros & Cons
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average build (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (32nd percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.354score per dollar
vs
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm0.023score per dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offers 15.4x better value for money
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
Verdict
Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
