Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN35MM Canon

Yongnuo YN35MM Canon

Yongnuo
46 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sony
94
Yongnuo
39
Budget
Sony
91
Yongnuo
49
Street
Sony
90
Yongnuo
58
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Yongnuo
43
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Yongnuo
38
Landscape
Sony
79
Yongnuo
27
Portrait
Sony
78
Yongnuo
53
Professional
Sony
77
Yongnuo
37
Macro
Sony
69
Yongnuo
22

Specifications

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSYongnuo YN35MM Canon
Optics
Typezoom—
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm35 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5—
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/22
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony E—
FormatAPS-C★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.11 kg★0.18 kg
Filter Thread41 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓★—
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★—
Max Magnification0.215x★—

Pros & Cons

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Yongnuo YN35MM Canon

  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Pricing

Yongnuo YN35MM Canon is CA$106 cheaper (1.7x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Yongnuo YN35MM Canon

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider