TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm
TTArtisan
52 Overall Score
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Yongnuo
81 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Macro
Specifications
| TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm | Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 27 mm | 12 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 27 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 6 | 14 |
| Groups | 5 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 8★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.32 kg |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | STM stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 350 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Pros & Cons
TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (66th percentile)
- Below average optical (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Pricing
TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm0.238score per dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.159score per dollar
TTArtisan APS-C 27mm f/2.8 27mm offers 1.5x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
