Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 50mm F1.0 R WR 50mm
Fujifilm
65 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Fujifilm XF 50mm F1.0 R WR 50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 12 |
| Groups | 11 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 5★ | 2 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | Weather Resistant |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/1 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.08 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | Auto Focus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 700 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | 0.08x |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Fujifilm XF 50mm F1.0 R WR 50mm
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong optical (72nd percentile)
- Below average macro (28th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.076score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 50mm F1.0 R WR 50mm0.033score per dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm offers 2.3x better value for money
Fujifilm XF 50mm F1.0 R WR 50mm
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.
