Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

Sony
55 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Sony
57
Portrait
Sigma
91
Sony
41
Street
Sigma
88
Sony
56
Budget
Sigma
85
Sony
51
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Sony
47
Macro
Sigma
83
Sony
45
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Sony
50
Landscape
Sigma
77
Sony
59
Travel
Sigma
75
Sony
60

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmSony FE SEL35F18F 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements167
Groups115
Aspherical Elements43
ED Elements51
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingZEISS T* Anti-Reflective Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread72 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.550.24x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sony FE SEL35F18F 35mm is CA$501 cheaper (1.7x less).

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider