Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Canon
61 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 10 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 22 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 13 |
| Groups | 11 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| ED Elements | 5★ | 1 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | 22-27★ |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 3.5-4.5 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 6 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon EF-S |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.39 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping AF Motor | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm | 240 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55★ | 0.17x |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
- Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Pricing
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm0.076score per dollar
vs
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM0.136score per dollar
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM offers 1.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
