Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 RXD

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 RXD

Tamron
71 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Tamron
62
Portrait
Sigma
90
Tamron
61
Street
Sigma
88
Tamron
60
Macro
Sigma
83
Tamron
87
Budget
Sigma
85
Tamron
72
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Tamron
65
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Tamron
61
Landscape
Sigma
77
Tamron
60
Travel
Sigma
75
Tamron
62

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmTamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 RXD
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm70 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements1615
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4.5
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.43 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorRXD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm67 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 RXD

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (70th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 RXD

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di III 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 RXD Better at:

Macro

Also Consider