Meike 50mm f/1.2 50mm

Meike 50mm f/1.2 50mm

Meike
33 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Meike
28
Sigma
98
Portrait
Meike
24
Sigma
90
Street
Meike
25
Sigma
88
Budget
Meike
25
Sigma
85
Video Cinema
Meike
28
Sigma
85
Macro
Meike
44
Sigma
83
Wildlife Sports
Meike
26
Sigma
80
Landscape
Meike
33
Sigma
77
Travel
Meike
25
Sigma
75

Specifications

Meike 50mm f/1.2 50mmSigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min50 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm28 mm
Elements1216
Groups711
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingMulti-LayerSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.62 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance600 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Pros & Cons

Meike 50mm f/1.2 50mm

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Pricing

Meike 50mm f/1.2 50mm

No current pricing available

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider