Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm

Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm

Canon
65 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Canon
61
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
67
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
77
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
62
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
58
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
54
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
64
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
65
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
65
Nikon
75

Specifications

Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min11 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max22 mm28 mm
Elements1213
Groups911
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperture4-5.6f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountCanon EF-MNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.22 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread55 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops3 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance150 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.30x1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM 11-22mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider