KOMQI AF-S NIKKOR 20 mm f/1.8G ED

KOMQI AF-S NIKKOR 20 mm f/1.8G ED

KOMQI
42 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
KOMQI
35
Nikon
95
Portrait
KOMQI
54
Nikon
89
Street
KOMQI
48
Nikon
86
Budget
KOMQI
45
Nikon
86
Macro
KOMQI
19
Nikon
85
Landscape
KOMQI
24
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
KOMQI
39
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
KOMQI
35
Nikon
78
Travel
KOMQI
30
Nikon
75

Specifications

KOMQI AF-S NIKKOR 20 mm f/1.8G EDNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min20 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max20 mm28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.35 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

KOMQI AF-S NIKKOR 20 mm f/1.8G ED

  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

KOMQI AF-S NIKKOR 20 mm f/1.8G ED is CA$452 cheaper (1.4x less).

KOMQI AF-S NIKKOR 20 mm f/1.8G ED0.040score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.6x better value for money

KOMQI AF-S NIKKOR 20 mm f/1.8G ED

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider