Sigma Sports 185956 500mm
Sigma
52 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Sigma Sports 185956 500mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 500 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 500 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 13 |
| Groups | 11 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/32 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sigma SA | Nikon Z |
| Format | Full-Frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 3.17 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 3.50 m | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.67 | 1:5.26 |
Pros & Cons
Sigma Sports 185956 500mm
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong optical (66th percentile)
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average macro (32nd percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Sigma Sports 185956 500mm0.006score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.062score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 10.3x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.
