Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM
Sony
66 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Overall Score
Scores
Budget
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Street
Travel
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Macro
Specifications
| Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | — |
| Focal Length Min | 55 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | 4-5.6 | — |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony A | — |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weight | 0.31 kg★ | — |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | SAM | — |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 950 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM
- Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (74th percentile)
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (32nd percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Pricing
Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
No current pricing available
Verdict
Winner: Sony DT 55-200mm f/4-5.6 SAM
Scores 66 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 13 specs.
