Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm
Canon
63 Overall Score
vs
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm
Sony
89 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Budget
Travel
Street
Landscape
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm | Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 500 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 20 | 18 |
| Groups | 14 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 7★ | 2 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Nano AR Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/54 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | 4.5-7.1 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.36 kg | 0.42 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 95 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Dual Nano USM★ | SSM |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5 stops★ | 4 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 900 mm | 400 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.33x★ | 0.15x |
Pros & Cons
Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm
- Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Pricing
Canon L RF100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM 100-500mm0.015score per dollar
vs
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm0.029score per dollar
Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Sony G SELP28135G.SYX 28-135mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
