Sigma 750975

Sigma 750975

Sigma
39 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
27
Nikon
89
Macro
Sigma
15
Nikon
87
Budget
Sigma
54
Nikon
86
Street
Sigma
39
Nikon
85
Portrait
Sigma
48
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sigma
34
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
26
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
30
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
31
Nikon
71

Specifications

Sigma 750975Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Type—zoom
Focal Length Min100 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max400 mm28 mm
Elements—13
Groups—11
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture—f/2.8
Min Aperturef/5-6.3f/2.8
Constant—✓★
Diaphragm Blades—9★
Build
Mount—Nikon Z
Format—full-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight1.10 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread—67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Stepping Motor★
Stabilization—✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance—190 mm★
Max Magnification—1:5.26★

Pros & Cons

Sigma 750975

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong aperture (66th percentile)
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Sigma 750975 is CA$367 cheaper (1.3x less).

Sigma 7509750.034score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.060score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.8x better value for money

Sigma 750975

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

★ Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider