Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
75 Pontuação geral
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Vivitar
37 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Street
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Budget
Travel
Landscape
Macro
Especificações
| Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm | Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 55 mm |
| Elements | 9 | — |
| Groups | 6 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Nano-GI coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | — |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | 55mm |
| Format | APS-C★ | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.17 kg | 0.14 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 43 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | stepping motor★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✗ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 350 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 0.135x★ | — |
Prós e Contras
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong aperture (67th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Preços
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.019pontos por dólar
vs
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm0.495pontos por dólar
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm oferece 26.1x melhor custo-benefício
Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Vivitar VIV-CL-55 55mm
Veredito
Vencedor: Fujifilm Fujinon XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Scores 75 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
