Sigma 185955

Sigma 185955

Sigma
40 Pontuação geral
vs
Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Panasonic
64 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
Sigma
46
Panasonic
82
Street
Sigma
33
Panasonic
73
Portrait
Sigma
27
Panasonic
73
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
42
Panasonic
73
Video Cinema
Sigma
42
Panasonic
71
Budget
Sigma
35
Panasonic
66
Travel
Sigma
32
Panasonic
63
Landscape
Sigma
47
Panasonic
61
Macro
Sigma
41
Panasonic
54

Especificações

Sigma 185955Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min500 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max500 mm35 mm
Elements1612
Groups119
Aspherical Elements03
ED Elements31
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/32f/4
Min Aperturef/4f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon FL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight3.17 kg0.50 kg
Filter Thread46 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHSMdouble-magnet linear motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance3.50 m250 mm
Max Magnification0.15x0.23x

Prós e Contras

Sigma 185955

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average macro (27th percentile)

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (72nd percentile)

Preços

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

No current pricing available

Veredito

Vencedor: Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm

Scores 64 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Panasonic Lumix S Pro S-R1635 16-35mm Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports