Sigma Art 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM 135mm
Sigma
41 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Pontuação geral
Pontuações
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Especificações
| Sigma Art 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM 135mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 13 |
| Groups | 10 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| Coating | Super Multi-Layer Coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sigma SA | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 1.13 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5 | 1:5.26 |
Prós e Contras
Sigma Art 135mm f/1.8 DG HSM 135mm
- Strong optical (79th percentile)
- Below average build (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Veredito
Vencedor: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.