Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R

Olympus
63 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
Olympus
46
Nikon
95
Portrait
Olympus
59
Nikon
89
Street
Olympus
65
Nikon
86
Budget
Olympus
69
Nikon
86
Macro
Olympus
39
Nikon
85
Landscape
Olympus
44
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Olympus
48
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Olympus
48
Nikon
78
Travel
Olympus
65
Nikon
75

Especificações

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 RNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typetelephotozoom
Focal Length Min40 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max150 mm28 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
Min Aperture4.0-5.6f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsNikon Z
Formatmicro-four-thirdsfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.19 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeMSCStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance900 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:6.251:5.26

Prós e Contras

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f:4.0-5.6 R

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Veredito

Vencedor: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports