Sigma 49B969

Sigma 49B969

Sigma
60 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
Sigma
68
Nikon
95
Portrait
Sigma
79
Nikon
89
Street
Sigma
59
Nikon
86
Budget
Sigma
54
Nikon
86
Macro
Sigma
70
Nikon
85
Landscape
Sigma
52
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
61
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
47
Nikon
78
Travel
Sigma
34
Nikon
75

Especificações

Sigma 49B969Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min20 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max20 mm28 mm
Elements1313
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating, Nano Porous Coating (NPC)Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight4.13 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:6.671:5.26

Prós e Contras

Sigma 49B969

  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Veredito

Vencedor: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports