Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

Canon
64 Pontuação geral
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Pontuação geral

Pontuações

Professional
Canon
71
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
49
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
59
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
71
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
55
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
69
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
60
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
66
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
63
Nikon
75

Especificações

Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23
CoatingSWC, Air Sphere, and Fluorine CoatingsMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountCanon EFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.79 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.22x1:5.26

Prós e Contras

Canon L-series EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Veredito

Vencedor: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Melhor em:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports